White nationalist and Trump far-right strategist, Steve Bannon, has formed a Bowel Movement. Here is an example of The Movement in France, with Marine LePen. Steve’s Bowel Movement has enlisted Italy’s Matteo Salvini and Hungary’s Viktor Orban. Next is Dutch Geert Wilders.
This is an organization Bannon and his rich backer Robert Mercer have been dreaming of for years. Donald Trump is their blunt instrument in the US. They are putting more tools in the box…
Therefore, the so-called “axis” Bernie Sanders speaks of here isn’t some nebulous deep state illuminati cabal, ninjas hiding under your living room rug. It has names. Faces.
Plenty more fascist dictators waiting in the extremist right wings. And that’s how the shit hits the fan. When Mercer/ Bannon/ Trump do their Pinky and the Brain routine on the entire planet Earth with their help.
The average American doesn’t know the difference between Hungary and Turkey, much less have the ability to locate either on the map. The average American doesn’t know Trump is a symptom of right-wing extremists plotting ’round the world at this very moment. None of their ideas are new.
Notice Sanders’ piece isn’t published or even mentioned in the NY Times? They published a piece on Bannon’s message though…
Therefore, Sanders has been writing for the UK’s Guardian.
Guardian 13 Sep 2018
There is a global struggle taking place of enormous consequence. Nothing less than the future of the planet – economically, socially, and environmentally – is at stake.
At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, when the world’s top 1% now owns more wealth than the bottom 99%, we are seeing the rise of a new authoritarian axis.
While these regimes may differ in some respects, they share key attributes: hostility toward democratic norms, antagonism toward a free press, intolerance toward ethnic and religious minorities, and a belief government should benefit their own selfish financial interests. These leaders are deeply connected to a network of multibillionaire oligarchs who see the world as their economic plaything.
Those of us who believe in democracy, who believe a government must be accountable to its people, must understand the scope of this challenge if we are to effectively confront it.
It should be clear by now, Donald Trump and the right-wing movement that supports him is not a phenomenon unique to the United States. All around the world, in Europe, in Russia, in the Middle East, in Asia and elsewhere we are seeing movements led by demagogues who exploit people’s fears, prejudices, and grievances to achieve and hold on to power.
This trend certainly did not begin with Trump, but there’s no question authoritarian leaders around the world have drawn inspiration from the fact the leader of the world’s oldest and most powerful democracy seems to delight in shattering democratic norms.
Three years ago, who would have imagined the United States would stay neutral between Canada, our democratic neighbor and second largest trading partner, and Saudi Arabia, a monarchic, client state that treats women as third-class citizens?
It’s also hard to imagine Israel’s Netanyahu government would have moved to pass the recent “nation state law,” which essentially codifies the second-class status of Israel’s non-Jewish citizens, if Benjamin Netanyahu didn’t know Trump would have his back.
All of this is not exactly a secret. As the US continues to grow further and further apart from our longtime democratic allies, the US ambassador to Germany recently made clear the Trump administration’s support for right-wing extremist parties across Europe.
In addition to Trump’s hostility toward democratic institutions, we have a billionaire president who, in an unprecedented way, has blatantly embedded his own economic interests and those of his cronies into the policies of government. Other authoritarian states are even farther along in this kleptocratic process.
In Russia, it is impossible to tell where the decisions of government end and the interests of Vladimir Putin and his circle of oligarchs begin. They operate as one unit. Similarly, in Saudi Arabia, there is no debate about separation because the natural resources of the state, valued at trillions of dollars, belong to the Saudi royal family. In Hungary, far-right authoritarian leader Viktor Orbán is openly allied with Putin in Russia. In China, an inner circle led by Xi Jinping has steadily consolidated power, clamping down on domestic political freedom while it aggressively promotes a version of authoritarian capitalism abroad.
We must understand these authoritarians are part of a common front. They are in close contact with each other, share tactics and, as in the case of European and American right-wing movements, even share some of the same funders:
The Mercer family, for example, supporters of the infamous Cambridge Analytica, are key backers of Trump and of Breitbart News, which operates in Europe, the United States, and Israel to advance the same anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim agenda.
Republican megadonor Sheldon Adelson gives generously to right-wing causes in both the United States and Israel, promoting a shared agenda of intolerance and illiberalism in both countries.
The truth is, however, to effectively oppose right-wing authoritarianism, we
cannot simply go back to the failed status quo of the last several decades. Today in the United States, and in many other parts of the world, people are working longer hours for stagnating wages, and worry their children will have a lower standard of living than they do.
Our job is to fight for a future in which new technology and innovation works to benefit all people, not just a few. It is not acceptable the top 1% of the world’s population owns half the planet’s wealth, while the bottom 70% of the working age population accounts for just 2.7% of global wealth.
Together, governments of the world must come together to end the absurdity of the rich and multinational corporations stashing over $21 trillion in offshore bank accounts to avoid paying their fair share of taxes and then demanding their respective governments impose an austerity agenda on their working families.
It is not acceptable the fossil fuel industry continues to make huge profits while their carbon emissions destroy the planet for our children and grandchildren.
It is not acceptable a handful of multinational media giants, owned by a small number of billionaires, largely control the flow of information on the planet.
It is not acceptable trade policies that benefit large multinational corporations and encourage a race to the bottom hurt working people throughout the world as they are written out of public view.
It is not acceptable, with the cold war long behind us, countries around the world spend over $1 trillion a year on weapons of destruction, while millions of children die of easily treatable diseases.
In order to effectively combat the rise of the international authoritarian axis, we need an international progressive movement that mobilizes behind a vision of shared prosperity, security, and dignity for all people, and addresses the massive global inequality that exists, not only in wealth but in political power.
Such a movement must be willing to think creatively and boldly about the world we would like to see. While the authoritarian axis is committed to tearing down a post-second world war global order they see as limiting their access to power and wealth. It is not enough for us to simply defend that order as it exists now.
We must look honestly at how that order has failed to deliver on many of its promises, and how authoritarians have adeptly exploited those failures in order to build support for their agenda.
We must take the opportunity to reconceptualize a genuinely progressive global order based on human solidarity, an order that recognizes every person on this planet shares a common humanity, we all want our children to grow up healthy, to have a good education, have decent jobs, drink clean water, breathe clean air, and live in peace.
Our job is to reach out to those in every corner of the world who share these values, and who are fighting for a better world.
In a time of exploding wealth and technology, we have the potential to create a decent life for all people. Our job is to build on our common humanity and do everything we can to oppose all of the forces, whether unaccountable government power or unaccountable corporate power, who try to divide us up and set us against each other.
We know those forces work together across borders. We must do the same.
Bernie Sanders is a US Senator from Vermont.
We asked Yanis Varoufakis to comment on Bernie Sanders’ piece. Here is his response:
Bernie Sanders is spot-on. Financiers have long formed an international “brotherhood” to guarantee themselves international bailouts when their paper pyramids crash.
More recently, xenophobic right-wing zealots formed their very own Nationalist International, turning once proud people against another so they control their wealth and politics.
It is high time people from across the world form a Progressive International in the interests of a majority of people on every continent, in every country.
Sanders is also right when he says the solution is not to go back to a status quo, whose spectacular failure has paved the ground for the rise of the Nationalist International.
Our Progressive International must lead with a vision of the green, shared prosperity human ingenuity is capable of providing – as long as democracy is given a chance to enable it.
To that end, we need to do more than campaign together. Let us form a common council that draws out a common blueprint for an International New Deal, a progressive New Bretton Woods.
Our era will be remembered for the triumphant march of a globally unifying right-wing – a Nationalist International – that sprang out of the cesspool of financialized capitalism. Whether it also will be remembered for a successful humanist challenge to this menace depends on the willingness of progressives in the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, as well as countries like Mexico, India, and South Africa, to forge a coherent Progressive International.
Our task is not unprecedented. Fascists did not come to power in the mid-war period by promising violence, war, and concentration camps. They came to power by addressing good people who, following a severe capitalist crisis, had been treated for too long like livestock that had lost its market value. Instead of treating them like “deplorables,” fascists looked at them in the eye and promised to restore their pride, offered their friendship, gave them a sense they belonged to a larger ideal, allowed them to think of themselves as something more than sovereign consumers.
That injection of self-esteem was accompanied by warnings against the lurking “alien” who threatened their revived hope. The politics of “us versus them” took over, bleached of social class characteristics and defined solely in terms of identities.
The fear of losing status turned into tolerance of human rights abuses first against the suspect “others” and then against any and all dissent. Soon, as the establishment’s control over politics waned under the weight of the economic crisis it had caused, the progressives ended up marginalized or in prison. By then it was all over.
Is this not how Donald Trump first conquered the White House and is now winning the discursive war against a Democratic party establishment? Is this not reminiscent of the Conservative Brexiteers’ sudden appreciation of a National Health Service they starved of funds for decades, or the energetic embracing of democracy Thatcherism subordinated to the logic of market forces?
Are these not the ways of the hard right governments in Austria, Hungary, and Poland, of Greece’s Golden Dawn Nazis and, most poignantly, of Matteo Salvini, the strongman steering the new Italian government? Everywhere we look today we see manifestations of the resurgence of an ambitious Nationalist International, the likes of which we have not seen since the 1930s. As for the establishment, they are behaving as if with a penchant to repeat the Weimar Republic’s every mistake.
But enough of the diagnosis. The pertinent question now is: what must we do? A tactical alliance with the globalist establishment is out of the question. Tony Blair, Hilary Clinton, the social democratic establishment in continental Europe are too compromised by their monetary links to a degenerating financialized capitalism and its accompanying ideology.
For decades, they relied on free market “populism:” the false promise everyone can become better off as long as we submit to commodification. They’d like us to believe in a never-ending escalator will take us to the heights of consumer satisfaction. But it doesn’t exist.
Our generation’s 1929, which occurred in 2008, shattered this illusion. The establishment continued as if it were possible to mend things via a combination of austerity for the many, socialism for the very few and authoritarianism all around. All the while, the Nationalist International has been riding to victory, fueled by growing discontent.
To counter this power, progressives must specify very precisely the causes and nature of the people’s unrest and unhappiness: namely, the global oligarchy’s intense class war against the burgeoning precariat, against what is left of the western proletariat and, generally, against weaker citizens.
Next, we need to demonstrate the only way the many can regain control of our lives, our communities, our cities, and our countries is by coordinating our struggles along the axis of an Internationalist New Deal. While globalized financial capital can no longer be allowed to tear our societies into shreds, we must explain that no country is an island. Just like climate change demands of us both local and international action, so too does the fight against poverty, private debt, and rogue bankers.
To illustrate tariffs are not the best way of protecting our workers, since they mostly enrich local oligarchies, we must campaign for trade agreements that commit governments of poorer countries to legislating minimum living wages for their workers and guaranteed jobs locally. This way, communities can be revived in richer and poorer countries at once.
Even more ambitiously, our Progressive International must propose an International Monetary Clearing Union, of the type John Maynard Keynes suggested during the Bretton Woods conference in 1944, including well-designed restrictions on capital movements. By rebalancing wages, trade, and finance at a global scale, both involuntary migration and involuntary unemployment will recede, thus ending the moral panic over the human right to move freely about the world.
And who is going to piece together this desperately needed Progressive International?
Happily, there is no shortage of potential initiators: Bernie Sanders’ “political revolution” in the US, Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party in the UK, our Democracy in Europe Movement (DiEM25), Mexico’s president-elect, the progressive elements of the African National Congress, the various movements fighting against bigotry and austerity in India.
Let us begin today. More will follow us the moment when hatred and anger yield to rational hope.
Yanis Varoufakis is the former Greek finance minister and co-founder of DiEM25, whose New Deal for Europe will be put to European voters in the May 2019 European Parliament elections
We asked Bernie Sanders to comment on Yanis Varoufakis’ piece. Here is his response:
Yanis Varoufakis is exactly right. At a time of massive global wealth and income inequality, oligarchy, rising authoritarianism, and militarism, we need a Progressive International movement to counter these threats. It is not acceptable the top 1% of the world’s population owns more wealth than the bottom 99%, multinational corporations and the wealthy stash over $21 trillion in offshore bank accounts to avoid paying their fair share of taxes, and the fossil fuel industry continues to destroy the planet because countries are unable to cooperate effectively to combat climate change.
While the very rich get much richer, people all over the globe are working longer hours for stagnating wages, and fear for their children’s future. Authoritarians exploit these economic anxieties, creating scapegoats which pit one group against another.
The solution, as Varoufakis points out, is an international progressive agenda that brings working people together around a vision of shared prosperity, security, and dignity for all people. The fate of the world is at stake. Let us go forward together now!
(Header image: Diminish and Ascend, sculpture by David McCracken)